'Theories of Freud and Rogers'

'Among the greatest theorists in recent memoir atomic number 18 Carl Rogers and Sigmund Freud. two made advancements in psychology with theories build upon clinical severalise and experience (Goodwin, 2005). crimson though both theories were advanced everywhere countless geezerhood of enquiry and clinical experience, each is ground on unlike assumptions (Goodwin, 2005). The concept of homo nature and the design in the principle behind homosexual motivation are diametrically hostile in these theories (Goodwin, 2005).\n\n hold One\nFreuds psychoanalyticalal surmise comes from clinical look instead of the laboratory research. This has led to the reading of a notional perspective chiefly foc utilize on case real(a) and idiographic entropy for testing psychoanalytic hypotheses (Bornstein, 2007). The foundation for evaluating these ideas is referred to as nomothetic depth psychology and complements the traditional idiographic approach. This oblige provides guidelines used when piloting nomothetic studies of psychodynamic constructs (Bornstein, 2007). To be triple-crown in the act of nomothetic psychoanalysis it will strike not plainly develop sloshed methods for testing psychodynamic hypotheses besides also a way to give birth nomothetic research findings to obtain espousal within the psychoanalytic community (Bornstein, 2007). The clause provides an over gull of five steps to make nomothetic studies valuable in a clinical setting (Bornstein, 2007).\n\n name Two\nRogers and other(a) humanistic psychologists step up to raise qualitative more than vicenary methods and positive psychologists favor the reverse (Friedman, 2008). This article provides a trance on humanistic psychology and the quantitative research traditions. Rogers neer abandoned his commission to empirical information even though he unfastened up his view (Friedman, 2008). Some of the relevant concepts for Rogers involved nomothetic and idiographic methods and experiential versus spectator knowledge. Rogers held the... '