Ethics in Action.

Rex Roofing formed a contract with the ONeills for installation of a new roof on their house. The outlay of the contract was $2500. afterwards the take a leak had begun, Rex realized that he was not charging enough for the project and informed the ONeills that he could not do it. The ONeills agreed to knuckle under a higher price of $3200. We will, through the analysis of antecedent case precedents, state our opinions as to whether it was ethical for Rex to refuse to do the job at the pilot film price, and if the ONeills are ethically compel to pay more than the passe-partout contracted price. Case Precedent #1 Drennan v. spark draw close pavement material Co., 51 Cal. 2d 409 [L. A. No. 25024. In Bank. Dec. 31, 1958.] William Drennan, plaintiff, a licensed general contractor, submitted a call on the three-card monte Vista School Job for a surface job. onward Drennan could submit the beg, Drennan asked for bids from subcontractors to do the paving work. Of all of the subcontractors who submitted bids, fighter pavage Co. came in with the lowest bid. jumper cable sidewalk Co. bid the paving job at $7,131.60. Mrs. Johnson, Drennans secretary, repeated the bid to make accredited that the bid amount was correct and was confirm by Mr. Oppenheimer who was confidential information Paving Co.s construction engineer.

Drennan compiled his costs, $317, 385.00 including Star Paving Cos bid on his proposal to Monte Vista School. Drennan told Star Paving Co that if awarded the project, they would be awarded the subcontract. On July 28, 1955, Drennan was awarded the project. The next morning, Drennan sto p by Star Paving Co. and found out that the ! bid amount was a mistake and the job had to be through with(p) at $15,000. Drennan told the subcontractor that the work had to be done... If you want to get a full essay, rules of order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay